DigitalOcean vs Hetzner 2026
Choose DigitalOcean for developer experience and managed services; choose Hetzner if raw compute per dollar is your primary concern.
Pricing
Ease of Use
Core Features
Advanced Capabilities
DigitalOcean and Hetzner keep showing up in the same “best VPS for developers” threads, and for good reason. They’re both developer-focused cloud providers that skip the enterprise bloat of AWS, but they make very different tradeoffs. DigitalOcean bets on polish, managed services, and a massive tutorial library. Hetzner bets on giving you twice the hardware for half the price and letting you figure out the rest.
This comparison breaks down exactly where each provider excels, where they fall short, and which one actually saves you money once you factor in the full picture.
Quick Verdict
Choose DigitalOcean if you need managed Kubernetes, managed databases, a well-documented ecosystem, and you’re willing to pay a premium for a smoother developer experience. It’s the right call for small teams shipping SaaS products who don’t want to manage database backups themselves.
Choose Hetzner if you’re comfortable with Linux administration and want 2–3x more compute per dollar. It’s the obvious pick for personal projects, self-hosted infrastructure, CI/CD runners, media processing, and anything where raw performance matters more than managed services.
Pricing Compared
Let’s get specific, because this is where the decision usually gets made.
Entry-Level
DigitalOcean’s cheapest Droplet is $4/mo for 512 MB RAM and 1 vCPU. That’s fine for a static site proxy or a tiny webhook handler. Hetzner’s cheapest shared instance (CX22) gives you 2 GB RAM and 2 vCPUs for €3.29/mo. You’re getting roughly 4x the resources for slightly less money. That’s not a rounding error—that’s a fundamentally different value proposition.
Mid-Range (The Sweet Spot)
At the 8 GB / 4 vCPU tier, where a lot of production apps actually live, DigitalOcean charges $48/mo. Hetzner’s equivalent CPX31 runs €14.49/mo (~$15.90). That’s a 3x price difference for comparable specs. Even if you bump up to Hetzner’s dedicated vCPU line (CCX23 at €30.49/mo), you’re still paying significantly less than DigitalOcean’s General Purpose Droplets at the same tier.
Bandwidth Costs
DigitalOcean includes transfer allowances (e.g., 4 TB for a $24/mo Droplet) and charges $0.01/GB for overages. Hetzner includes 20 TB of outbound traffic on most cloud instances, with overages at €1.00/TB. For bandwidth-heavy workloads—media serving, large file downloads, API-heavy apps—Hetzner’s generous transfer allowance is a real cost saver.
Managed Services Premium
Here’s where DigitalOcean claws back some value. A managed PostgreSQL database starts at $15/mo on DigitalOcean. On Hetzner, there’s no managed database product, so you’re either running PostgreSQL on a VPS yourself (and handling backups, failover, and upgrades) or paying for a third-party managed database like Aiven or Supabase. Self-managing a database is “free” until your first 3 AM data corruption incident.
Similarly, DigitalOcean’s managed Kubernetes (DOKS) gives you a free control plane—you pay only for worker nodes. On Hetzner, you’re bootstrapping your own cluster with k3s or kubeadm. It works, and projects like hetzner-k3s-terraform make it reasonably smooth, but it’s more operational overhead.
Total Cost of Ownership
For a typical small SaaS stack (app server, database, Redis, object storage, load balancer), here’s a rough monthly comparison:
- DigitalOcean: $48 (app) + $15 (managed Postgres) + $15 (managed Redis) + $5 (Spaces) + $12 (LB) = ~$95/mo
- Hetzner: €14.49 (app) + €7.49 (DB server) + €3.29 (Redis server) + €5.99 (Object Storage) + €5.49 (LB) =
€36.75/mo ($40)
That’s less than half, but you’re managing your own database and Redis on Hetzner. If your team has strong ops skills, the savings compound over time. If you don’t, the managed services on DigitalOcean pay for themselves in reduced on-call stress.
Where DigitalOcean Wins
Developer Experience and Documentation
DigitalOcean’s community tutorials are genuinely useful. They have over 5,000 articles covering everything from setting up Nginx to deploying Django with Gunicorn. These aren’t marketing fluff pieces—they’re step-by-step guides that actually work. When you’re troubleshooting a production issue at midnight, that documentation matters.
The control panel is also noticeably better. Droplet creation, firewall management, DNS configuration—everything feels considered. Hetzner’s Cloud Console improved a lot after the 2024 redesign, but DigitalOcean still has the edge in UI polish.
Managed Services Ecosystem
If you want Kubernetes, managed databases (Postgres, MySQL, Redis, MongoDB, Kafka), App Platform (PaaS for deploying from Git), and Spaces (S3-compatible object storage) all under one roof with a single bill, DigitalOcean is the clear winner.
Hetzner has been expanding—they launched object storage in 2024 and load balancers have matured—but they still don’t offer managed databases or managed Kubernetes. For teams that want to minimize operational surface area, DigitalOcean’s managed stack is a real advantage.
Global Reach
DigitalOcean has data centers in New York, San Francisco, Toronto, London, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Bangalore, and Sydney. If you need to serve users in Asia-Pacific or Australia with low latency, DigitalOcean gives you local points of presence that Hetzner simply doesn’t have. Hetzner’s US expansion (Ashburn and Hillsboro) was a big step, but you’re still limited to Europe and the US.
App Platform
DigitalOcean’s App Platform lets you deploy from a GitHub/GitLab repo with automatic builds, zero-downtime deploys, and managed TLS. It’s not as flexible as running your own server, but for straightforward web apps and APIs, it removes a lot of yak-shaving. Pricing starts at $5/mo for a basic container. Hetzner has nothing comparable.
Where Hetzner Wins
Raw Price-Performance
This is the obvious one, but it bears repeating with specifics. Hetzner’s CPX31 (4 vCPU, 8 GB, 160 GB NVMe) costs €14.49/mo. Running Geekbench 6 on these instances, the Hetzner CPX line (AMD EPYC) consistently scores within 10% of DigitalOcean’s General Purpose Droplets at the same spec—instances that cost $63/mo. You’re paying roughly 75% less for nearly identical single-thread and multi-thread performance.
For workloads where compute is the primary cost driver—build servers, video transcoding, data processing pipelines, game servers—this gap is enormous.
ARM64 Instances
Hetzner’s CAX line (Ampere Altra) offers ARM64 instances starting at €3.29/mo for 2 vCPUs and 4 GB RAM. These are dedicated cores, not shared, which means consistent performance without noisy-neighbor issues. For workloads that compile and run on ARM (Node.js, Go, Python, most containerized apps), the CAX line offers arguably the best price-to-performance ratio on any public cloud.
DigitalOcean doesn’t offer ARM instances. If you’re building ARM-native containers or want to test ARM deployments, Hetzner is the only option between these two.
Dedicated Servers
Hetzner’s Server Auction and dedicated server lineup gives you bare metal hardware starting around €39/mo for older models and €50–100/mo for current-gen machines. These are real physical servers—no hypervisor overhead, full hardware access, massive local storage options (often multiple NVMe or HDD drives included).
For workloads that need predictable performance, large local storage, or specific hardware features (ECC RAM, hardware RAID), dedicated servers are a category Hetzner owns outright. DigitalOcean doesn’t offer anything comparable.
Bandwidth Generosity
20 TB of included outbound traffic on most cloud instances is generous by any standard. DigitalOcean’s transfer allowances are reasonable but scale linearly with instance cost (roughly 1 TB per $6/mo of instance pricing). If you’re running a CDN origin, serving large downloads, or hosting media-heavy applications, Hetzner’s transfer policy can save hundreds of dollars monthly at scale.
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
Compute
Both providers offer solid compute options, but the lineups are different. DigitalOcean categorizes Droplets into Basic (shared CPU), General Purpose, CPU-Optimized, Memory-Optimized, and GPU Droplets. The GPU Droplets (NVIDIA H100) are available for AI/ML workloads, though availability can be limited and pricing is steep ($2.50+/hr).
Hetzner splits into shared (CX = Intel, CPX = AMD), dedicated (CCX = AMD EPYC), and ARM (CAX = Ampere). The naming convention is less intuitive, but the specs are clearly documented. Hetzner doesn’t currently offer GPU instances.
Storage
DigitalOcean charges $0.10/GB/mo for block storage volumes. Hetzner charges €0.052/GB/mo. But Hetzner’s base instances also come with more included NVMe storage—the CPX31 includes 160 GB compared to DigitalOcean’s equivalent Droplet at 160 GB, but you get there at a much lower price point on Hetzner.
Object storage: DigitalOcean Spaces is mature and well-integrated ($5/mo for 250 GB + 1 TB transfer). Hetzner’s Object Storage is newer but functional and S3-compatible (€5.99/mo for 1 TB storage). Spaces has a built-in CDN; Hetzner’s doesn’t yet.
Networking
Both offer VPCs, floating IPs, and firewalls. DigitalOcean’s load balancers start at $12/mo; Hetzner’s at €5.49/mo. DigitalOcean supports DNS management in the control panel; Hetzner’s DNS management through their DNS Console works but is a separate interface.
One note: Hetzner’s private networking (vSwitch for dedicated servers, Cloud Networks for cloud instances) works fine within a single location but doesn’t span locations. DigitalOcean’s VPC is similarly region-scoped. Neither offers cross-region private networking natively.
Backups and Snapshots
DigitalOcean charges 20% of the Droplet price for automated weekly backups. Snapshots are $0.06/GB/mo. Hetzner charges 20% of the server price for backups (keeping 7 daily, 4 weekly, 2 monthly) and €0.0108/GB/mo for snapshots. Hetzner’s backup retention policy is more generous, and the snapshot pricing is significantly cheaper.
API and Infrastructure as Code
Both have mature APIs and official Terraform providers. DigitalOcean’s Terraform provider (digitalocean/digitalocean) is well-maintained and covers nearly every resource type. Hetzner’s provider (hetznercloud/hcloud) is similarly comprehensive for cloud resources but doesn’t manage dedicated servers.
DigitalOcean’s CLI tool (doctl) is more polished and feature-complete than Hetzner’s (hcloud). Both support common operations, but doctl integrates with App Platform, Kubernetes, and managed databases in ways that hcloud can’t since Hetzner doesn’t offer those services.
Support
DigitalOcean offers ticket-based support on all plans, with priority support available on Business plans. Response times vary, but community reports suggest 2–6 hours for standard tickets. Premium support plans exist but aren’t cheap.
Hetzner’s support is ticket-based and known for being responsive on infrastructure issues (network, hardware) but less helpful on software-level problems. They’re pretty clear that they provide infrastructure, not consulting. Response times on hardware issues are typically fast—often under an hour for critical infrastructure problems.
Migration Considerations
Moving from DigitalOcean to Hetzner
Data transfer: Snapshot your Droplets, download them, and upload to Hetzner. Alternatively, use rsync or a tool like Clonezilla for live migration. Hetzner doesn’t support importing DigitalOcean snapshots directly, so expect some manual work.
Managed services replacement: This is the biggest hurdle. You’ll need to self-host any managed databases, set up your own Redis instances, and if you’re using DOKS, rebuild your Kubernetes cluster from scratch. Budget 1–2 weeks for a production migration if managed services are heavily used.
DNS: If you’re using DigitalOcean’s DNS, migrate records to Hetzner DNS or a third-party like Cloudflare before cutting over.
Terraform: If your infrastructure is already in Terraform, swapping providers is a rewrite of resource definitions but the logic stays the same. The hcloud provider maps fairly cleanly to digitalocean provider concepts.
Moving from Hetzner to DigitalOcean
Data transfer: Similar process in reverse. Hetzner snapshots can be downloaded and converted, though you may need to adjust disk images to match Droplet requirements.
Cost shock: Be prepared for your monthly bill to roughly double or triple for equivalent compute. Budget accordingly and consider whether managed services offset the raw compute cost increase.
Feature gains: You’ll get access to managed databases, App Platform, and DOKS. If operational simplification is the goal, the higher cost may be justified.
Network considerations: If you were relying on Hetzner’s European locations for GDPR compliance, verify that DigitalOcean’s Frankfurt or Amsterdam regions meet your data residency requirements.
Our Recommendation
For solo developers and small projects: Hetzner, hands down. The CAX ARM instances at €3.29/mo give you dedicated cores and 4 GB RAM—enough to run a full application stack for a side project. The savings compound if you’re running multiple projects.
For SaaS startups with small teams (2–5 devs): DigitalOcean, unless you have strong ops expertise. The managed database and Kubernetes offerings let your team focus on product instead of infrastructure. The premium is worth it when developer time is your most expensive resource.
For cost-sensitive production workloads: Hetzner. If you’re running CI/CD pipelines, media processing, game servers, or any compute-heavy workload where you’re primarily paying for CPU and RAM, Hetzner’s pricing is hard to argue with. The 3x cost difference at the mid-tier level adds up fast.
For teams needing global presence: DigitalOcean. If your users are in Asia-Pacific or Australia, Hetzner’s two US locations and three European locations won’t cut it. You’ll need DigitalOcean’s Bangalore or Sydney regions, or you’ll need to pair Hetzner with a CDN like Cloudflare or Bunny.
For bare metal needs: Hetzner is the only choice here. Dedicated servers with direct hardware access, massive local storage, and predictable performance at reasonable prices. DigitalOcean doesn’t compete in this space.
The reality is that many teams use both. Hetzner for compute-heavy backend services and CI runners, DigitalOcean for managed databases and customer-facing applications that benefit from global distribution. There’s no rule that says you have to pick just one.
Read our full DigitalOcean review | See DigitalOcean alternatives
Read our full Hetzner review | See Hetzner alternatives
Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep the site running and produce quality content.